INTRODUCTION
Acne is one of the most common diseases worldwide, affecting 85% of adolescents. In addition, acne often persists into adulthood, with over 50% of women reporting acne between 20-29 years of age and over 35% between 30-39 years of age.1,2 While topical agents are typically sufficient for mild acne, moderate to severe acne often requires treatment with systemic agents, such as oral antibiotics, spironolactone, and isotretinoin.3Oral antibiotics are the most common systemic agent used in the treatment of acne and dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per capita than any other specialty.4,5 However, antibiotic use may be associated with a variety of adverse outcomes including antibiotic resistance, pharyngitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and colon and breast cancer.6–15 As a result, there have been calls to reduce overuse of antibiotics throughout medicine and multiple guidelines regarding the treatment of acne recommend limiting the duration of therapy with oral antibiotics.16–20,3,21For women with moderate to severe acne, spironolactone may represent an effective, safe, and well-tolerated alternative to oral antibiotics and its use is becoming more common over time.5,22–27 However, despite expert opinion supporting the use of spironolactone in the treatment of acne, spironolactone is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication and clinical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of spironolactone is limited to small studies.24–27 The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes with spironolactone and oral tetracycline-class antibiotics among a large, broadly representative population of women with acne. Specifically, this study sought to characterize the frequency with which women who are started on either spironolactone or an oral tetracycline-class antibiotic subsequently switch to a different systemic agent within the first year of therapy, since this switching may reflect treatment failure, whether due to lack of efficacy, side-effects, cost, or other reasons.28
METHODS
Data Source
This study was a retrospective analysis using the OptumInsight™ Clinformatics™ DataMart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN) between 2010 and 2016. The OptumInsight Clinformatics DataMart includes de-identified commercial claims data for approximately